Post on Oct 06, 2025

Ruben

·

8 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Ruben
·
·
nope, not really
Ruben
·
·
One thing I tried btw is doing a “find company with natural language” and asked it to look for similar companies to the ones I had AND checked the website had a pricing page. It got it WAY WAY better than the lookalike audience of Ocean.io or Clay… Sayli G. FYI
Ruben
·
·
Pleasure
Ruben
·
·
Natalie H. it would then be good to have a “lookalike audiences with natural languages” using Claygent as an option…
Ruben
·
·
btw Natalie H. I’ve been testing Ocean.io on Ocean.io’s side + with natural language and it’s really good the Claygent with NL BUT When you put a few criteria like growth of a company (eg funding round, hiring, social media growth etc.) where you’re asking for a few indicators, in many case it skipped one of those searches when what it should do is: If it’s NO for one of them, waterfall check the other. If it’s YES for any of them, then maybe you can skip. eg if you can see they recently go a funding round, no need to check for hiring or social media growth, you have 1 indicator of a YES. Then skip others. But many times what happened is I got a NO and SKIPPED on the same row… that’s not good!
Natalie H.
·
·
Thank you for testing Ruben! Feel free to send the link (url) to the table so we can take a look at the rows that said "NO' and were skipped!
Ruben
·
·
Here Natalie H. https://app.clay.com/workspaces/784835/workbooks/wb_0t3pplmz6rr2BagSkUm/tables/t_0t3pwxjM9FJqsneMvqQ/views/gv_0t3pwxkoGSvwNqkVok7
Mitch H.
·
·
Hey Ruben, If you click into the the individual cell for each company returned you can see the reason why a certain field was skipped, hope this helps. See below:

Loading comments

Ruben
·
·
nope, not really
Ruben
·
·
One thing I tried btw is doing a “find company with natural language” and asked it to look for similar companies to the ones I had AND checked the website had a pricing page. It got it WAY WAY better than the lookalike audience of Ocean.io or Clay… Sayli G. FYI
Ruben
·
·
Pleasure
Ruben
·
·
Natalie H. it would then be good to have a “lookalike audiences with natural languages” using Claygent as an option…
Ruben
·
·
btw Natalie H. I’ve been testing Ocean.io on Ocean.io’s side + with natural language and it’s really good the Claygent with NL BUT When you put a few criteria like growth of a company (eg funding round, hiring, social media growth etc.) where you’re asking for a few indicators, in many case it skipped one of those searches when what it should do is: If it’s NO for one of them, waterfall check the other. If it’s YES for any of them, then maybe you can skip. eg if you can see they recently go a funding round, no need to check for hiring or social media growth, you have 1 indicator of a YES. Then skip others. But many times what happened is I got a NO and SKIPPED on the same row… that’s not good!
Natalie H.
·
·
Thank you for testing Ruben! Feel free to send the link (url) to the table so we can take a look at the rows that said "NO' and were skipped!
Ruben
·
·
Here Natalie H. https://app.clay.com/workspaces/784835/workbooks/wb_0t3pplmz6rr2BagSkUm/tables/t_0t3pwxjM9FJqsneMvqQ/views/gv_0t3pwxkoGSvwNqkVok7
Mitch H.
·
·
Hey Ruben, If you click into the the individual cell for each company returned you can see the reason why a certain field was skipped, hope this helps. See below: