Recommendations for LATAM Data-Enrichment Tools

Boaz D. · 2025-12-04T21:11:18.082Z

Anyone with LATAM outbound and data-enrichment experience who can recommend the best enrichment tool for the LATAM market, CLAY, Apollo, anything else ?

15 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Abdul K.
·
·
Clay Boaz D.
Abdul S.
·
·
Hey Boaz D. i'd go with clay using a waterfall - combine kaspr, lusha, snov, and hunter for best coverage.. apollo works decent for brazil/mexico but hit or miss elsewhere
Abdul S.
·
·
which countries you targeting specifically? coverage varies a lot
🙏1
Boaz D.
·
·
mainly Mexico, Colombia, Peru, Brazil and Central America
Abdul S.
·
·
gotcha - here's the breakdown: brazil/mexico: apollo + clay both work colombia/peru/central america: clay waterfall only (apollo weak) use clay waterfall (kaspr → lusha → snov → hunter) then apollo backup
Abdul S.
·
·
need help setting up?
Boaz D.
·
·
Can you please explain why Kaspr and lusha are better, and why you choose this workflow ?
Abdul S.
·
·
kaspr: strong european and latam b2b data, good mobile numbers lusha: solid latam coverage (especially brazil/mexico) verified emails and direct dials both source locally in latam vs just scraping linkedin that's why they're better waterfall = if one misses, other catches it, maximizes find rate costs more credits but worth it for latam
Boaz D.
·
·
Did you try fullenrich ?
Abdul S.
·
·
haven't used fullenrich extensively for latam specifically, but i've heard mixed reviews how's it working for you? their waterfall approach similar to what i mentioned but all-in-one tool
Abdul S.
·
·
curious if their latam coverage is better than kaspr/lusha combo what's your hit rate been?
Boaz D.
·
·
I did a quick test and fullenrich gave me better results than Lusha
Hunain F.
·
·
If fullenrich is giving you better results you could lean on it for LATAM and maybe use kaspr and lusha as a backup for any gaps
Abdul S.
·
·
Boaz D. interesting - which countries did you test? if fullenrich is hitting better, swap it into your waterfall: fullenrich → kaspr → snov
Abdul S.
·
·
what was your hit rate difference?

Abdul K.
·
·
Clay Boaz D.
Abdul S.
·
·
Hey Boaz D. i'd go with clay using a waterfall - combine kaspr, lusha, snov, and hunter for best coverage.. apollo works decent for brazil/mexico but hit or miss elsewhere
Abdul S.
·
·
which countries you targeting specifically? coverage varies a lot
🙏1
Boaz D.
·
·
mainly Mexico, Colombia, Peru, Brazil and Central America
Abdul S.
·
·
gotcha - here's the breakdown: brazil/mexico: apollo + clay both work colombia/peru/central america: clay waterfall only (apollo weak) use clay waterfall (kaspr → lusha → snov → hunter) then apollo backup
Abdul S.
·
·
need help setting up?
Boaz D.
·
·
Can you please explain why Kaspr and lusha are better, and why you choose this workflow ?
Abdul S.
·
·
kaspr: strong european and latam b2b data, good mobile numbers lusha: solid latam coverage (especially brazil/mexico) verified emails and direct dials both source locally in latam vs just scraping linkedin that's why they're better waterfall = if one misses, other catches it, maximizes find rate costs more credits but worth it for latam
Boaz D.
·
·
Did you try fullenrich ?
Abdul S.
·
·
haven't used fullenrich extensively for latam specifically, but i've heard mixed reviews how's it working for you? their waterfall approach similar to what i mentioned but all-in-one tool
Abdul S.
·
·
curious if their latam coverage is better than kaspr/lusha combo what's your hit rate been?
Boaz D.
·
·
I did a quick test and fullenrich gave me better results than Lusha
Hunain F.
·
·
If fullenrich is giving you better results you could lean on it for LATAM and maybe use kaspr and lusha as a backup for any gaps
Abdul S.
·
·
Boaz D. interesting - which countries did you test? if fullenrich is hitting better, swap it into your waterfall: fullenrich → kaspr → snov
Abdul S.
·
·
what was your hit rate difference?