Quentin R. Hey Quentin, I have a table: https://app.clay.com/workspaces/800250/workbooks/wb_0t7434vMykDX9dA4XED/tables/t_0t8r7y4vFZvRxUPMXzY/views/gv_0t7442yyShpcvgyzvse, which is acting extremely weird. I have a list with companies, with sizes between 50 and 1000, and I have run 100 rows and over 95 rows returned very low numbers compared to their actual size. I believe there is an issue with the Clay Enricher.
This discrepancy is actually expected behavior. The "Size" column shows company size ranges from your original search (like "201-500 employees"), while the "Employee Count" from enrichment shows current actual headcount from our data providers.
The "associated member count" used in company searches refers to profiles linked to a company on professional networks, which includes current AND former employees, plus people who incorrectly claim association. This inflates the numbers compared to actual current headcount.
For the most accurate employee counts, the "Enrich Company" action pulls real-time data when requested, rather than relying on search database info that's updated in batches. The enrichment data is typically more current and accurate than the initial search results.
This isn't a bug - it's showing you more precise current headcount versus the broader ranges used for search filtering.
Did that answer your question?
If you still need help understanding the data discrepancies or have other questions about your table, I’m here to assist. Would you like to provide more details about what you’re trying to resolve or understand?
