Adam G.

Thx Bo (.

just use less filters and cast a wider net?

Thx for clarifying Bo (. I have always experienced this using the find people from a list of companies in clay. Once I get too granular a large list goes from x to 50. If I limit to 5 people per company and if the companies are 10k+ I'll likely get people data for 10 companies, 5 contact per company. How do you suggest I do this differently?

Yash M. the problem with trying out the people search with only a limit on total leads is that 1 large company might have 20-30 people in the ICP. I don't want that many people at a single company which is why I like to limit to 4-5 per company.

I'm using zoominfo in the zoominfo platform to find people and then importing back to clay. that's the cheapest and more effective way I've found to do it with the tools I have access to.

Yash M. OK good to know I'm not totally incompetent and there is a bug. I think this bug has been around for awhile (like all year since April or so). I've always encountered this and have found it perplexing. Thanks for the info. Can you let me know when this bug is fixed? Seems like a major bug. It's easy to enrich a list of people. The challenge is the transition from a company table to find the right people. Once you have the people list it's pretty straight forward. Thx.

Yash M. here's the table https://app.clay.com/workspaces/507736/workbooks/wb_0t2e8avz2gnh2wDB6vN/tables/t_0t2e9agptpdgTjff8nw/views/gv_0t2e9ahEHjCzjkt4cjf I've given up on the "find people from companies" tool. I have always had underwhelming results and have not been sure if i'm using it wrong or if it just doesn't work. I like to limit the number of people per company to 4-5 depending since a large company (10k+) can have too many potential ICP job titles. Once I limit the number per company, my results plummet to 50, not 50 out of "x" total.

LuisArturo any update on this? is there a bug or am i just not doing it right?

LuisArturo i typically have a bottleneck going from a list of companies to finding people. The issue I mentioned in this thread is typical. Is it something i'm doing wrong or is there really a bug?