Yash M.

Hi Jill - just sharing another workaround here that may be much cheaper for you to execute (0.2 credits per row instead of 15). Let us know what you think? Please reach out if you have any follow-ups. Thank you! https://www.loom.com/share/1c82a8e4d09a471d99e6a2dd9abea71e

Ah I think I see where the confusion is now. The find people at company enrichment is in fact a paid enrichment (1 credit per row). Sorry about the back and forth!

At the moment this is the only workaround available in case you're looking to smoothen out your flow.

Hi Petar - if you go under edit settings > full configuration in the Find people at company in-line enrichment, you can remove the paid providers from the waterfall and only keep the native clay database which is free :)

Sounds good! I'll leave this conversation open for now so you can get back to us in case you have any questions!

Hi Petar. Thanks so much for your patience here. In that case, you could also try the in-line "Find people at company" enrichment (instead of the find people source). This will allow you to have a find people column in your company table itself. This column will find people and store all of them in the same cell for each row. You can then add a claygent column to extract the decision maker out of the people found for each company. Finally, run the email waterfall only on the decision maker in this table.

For the rest of the people found, you can send them as their own individual rows into a new table using send table data action. These can then be enriched via email waterfall in the new table. Let me know if this sounds like a smoother way to achieve your goal? Thanks!

Gotcha. Instead of the current flow what if you tried something along these lines?

This flow will help achieve a few things:

Let me know if this doesn't work or if I'm missing something here and I'll be happy to think this through further. Thank you!

Hi Petar - happy to help you optimize here. In order to provide the right recommendation it would be good to know what the final goal here is? What is the final data point you're trying to achieve for these leads that you find?

Overall your current workflow makes sense to me without having context on your end goal. If there are specific columns or formulas that are causing the flow to break, could you point those out so I can take a deeper look there? Thank you!

You as well, Gui!

Of course! I will go ahead and close this conversation now but please feel free to reach out if you need help in the future - thank you!

Hi Gui - your referral request has been approved at our end. Provided the user you referred signed up for a paid plan, the referral conversion should reflect in your rewardful account in 30-35 days from now. I hope this helps. Please let us know if you have any other questions.