Experience with Fullenrich for Mobile Phone Enrichment: Clay Table vs. Waterfall Method?

·May 09, 2026 11:04 AM·

I was looking at Fullenrich this morning and curious if anyone had experience with using it exclusively in a clay table for mobile phone enrichment vs a standard waterfall enrichment for mobile numbers?

3 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Discuss Anything

Experience with Fullenrich for Mobile Phone Enrichment: Clay Table vs. Waterfall Method?

Brian L.

·May 09, 2026 11:04 AM·

I was looking at Fullenrich this morning and curious if anyone had experience with using it exclusively in a clay table for mobile phone enrichment vs a standard waterfall enrichment for mobile numbers?

3 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

swaroop m.
·
(edited)·
I've used it, inside clay
swaroop m.
·
·
Full enrich is good for B2B specifically, but the standard waterfall in clay is better because it has multiple data providers outside B2B domain
1
Mariana R.
·
·
It depends on the region you are in. I work on B2B and I've found the standard waterfall enrichment very efficient in north america, but I struggle to get a phone number match in europe (which is the region I work with) What I usually do is running the standard waterfall in clay, and for the phones i cannot catch I run the fullenrich automation.
1

swaroop m.
·
(edited)·
I've used it, inside clay
swaroop m.
·
·
Full enrich is good for B2B specifically, but the standard waterfall in clay is better because it has multiple data providers outside B2B domain
1
Mariana R.
·
·
It depends on the region you are in. I work on B2B and I've found the standard waterfall enrichment very efficient in north america, but I struggle to get a phone number match in europe (which is the region I work with) What I usually do is running the standard waterfall in clay, and for the phones i cannot catch I run the fullenrich automation.
1