Valentin

Hey Matthew S. - Findymail founder here, that doesn't sound normal indeed, sorry about that, could you please let me know the input/profile (in DM) so we can have a look?

Luján L. no, what issue are you having?

Petar R. You can use this to get more people: https://app.findymail.com/docs/#tag/misc/post/api/search/employees but not native in Clay unfortunately

got it, yeah Findymail to enrich missing leads and/or validate catch-all emails from FE will be your best bet then

Findymail but the biggest differentiator will likely be the email validation used, not as much the enrichment are you using the default waterfall validation (Zerobounce) or something else?

Hey Oleh D. , given you're using Zerobounce as the validaton step, just keep in mind that it doesn't support validating catch-all emails so every catch-all email will be marked as ""invalid"", even though they're not truely invalid, Zerobounce is just unable to validate them (which is different) Switching to an email validation provider like Findymail in the waterfall settings can help getting more coverage for those cases too (as it supports catch-all validation)

means millionverifier wasn't able to verify that email

it is an option: https://developer.millionverifier.com/#operation/single-verification

Luis C. catch-all is not necessarily "invalid" even though that's how Clay displays it, it just means that Zerobounce wasn't able to verify it (since they don't support catch-all) Switching the validation provider in your waterfall to Findymail solves this, as it supports real time catch all verification

Guy H. Zerobounce does not validate catch-all emails, so it will mark "invalid" every catch-all email even if the email is good (it's just that they can't validate it, not that it's invalid). Switching your validation provider in the waterfall settings to Findymail should help you validate more emails as it supports catch-all validation