Mike R.

Hey Natalie - Nope it's all the same queued runs that kicked off 32 hours ago, I haven't rerun anything. And yes if you can figure out why Clay's throttling the requests so hard when there's plenty of concurrency please as this is literally going to take 7 days to complete haha

Yes I have. As mentioned it wouldn't take a full week to run a single enrichment when I have plenty of concurrency available. It's most certainly a clay batching issue and going extremely slow. If would've known I would've just use zenrows http instead of clays zenrows integration since that is the issue. Can the team look at this since I don’t really have a full week to waste while this single enrichment runs?

it's been 26 hours since this started running and concurrency isn't the issue as you can see, I think it's something on Clay's side, can you take a look?

Hi there thanks for the response! It’s definitely not a concurrency issues as I have 350 concurrency with them. Are you guys able to figure out the issue since this hasn't been a problem previously? At this rate it'll take about a week to finish just my zenrows actions

Talk to person

Here's table https://app.clay.com/workspaces/10589/workbooks/wb_b9dgKG59FYMx/tables/t_KzgNWBDjyakf/views/gv_fsJ3ziPynHyY

This table: https://app.clay.com/workspaces/10589/tables/t_YRBUFKOcZ4xB/views/gv_I2SG4AL65Z4I You can check this To Email: giulia@twind.it You can see the lead id we're trying to remove exists in smartlead so it should be removed: 2637613504 We get tons of these errors when running this action: {"error":"invalid input syntax for type integer: "NaN""} And turns out many of the leads do exist in Smartlead, think this has been an ongoing issue. Can you figure out the issue and lmk when fixed?

I’d just get a central storage db going. The cheapest and most user friendly one would be something like supabase then just have all your different tables/automations referencing that as your global db.