Hi! 👋 I’m looking to reliably enrich company size data from LinkedIn profiles using Clay. Could you tell me which enrichment source or integration you recommend as the most accurate and up-to-date for retrieving company size from a LinkedIn URL? Thanks a lot for your help!
For enriching company size from a LinkedIn URL, we recommend "Enrich Company with Companies, People, Jobs" as your primary option. [1]
This enrichment accepts a Company LinkedIn URL as input (which provides the highest accuracy) and returns company size data along with employee count, industry, description, and other details. [2]
Alternative option: You can also use LeadMagic's Enrich Company action, which takes a LinkedIn company URL and returns employee count and employee count range data. [3]
Pro tip: Since Clay doesn't have native data but pulls from 100+ enrichment providers, consider using our waterfall feature to query multiple providers in sequence for the same data point—you'll only pay once a result is found, which maximizes both coverage and accuracy. [4]
Is that what you were looking for?
I’d like to use a filter on the company size afterward, so I’d prefer to avoid any AI-generated or inferred data — I need a numerical or structured employee count that I can reliably filter by. Could you confirm which enrichment option provides this kind of structured data (not AI-estimated text)?
For filterable numerical employee count data, these enrichments return structured numbers:
Best options:
Enrich Company with Companies, People, Jobs – Returns Employee Count (number) and Size (text range like "11-50 employees") [1]
Enrich Company with LeadMagic – Returns Employee Count (number) and Employee Count Range (object) [2]
Enrich Company with People Data Labs – Returns Employee Count (number) [3]
Also available:
All of these provide numerical employee count fields you can filter on directly—no AI estimation involved.
Is that what you were looking for?
you can either use 1- enrich company integration(uses clay credits - 1 per company_ 2- b2b-enrichment.com (you can use your api key)
You're absolutely right! Both options work well:
1. Enrich Company (Clay Credits)
2. HTTP API with your own provider
If you have an API key for b2b-enrichment.com or similar services, you can connect it via our HTTP API enrichment
You'll use your own credits/quota from that provider instead of Clay credits
Both give you the numerical employee count data you need for filtering. The first option is simpler to set up, while the second gives you more control if you already have an existing data provider relationship.
Was that helpful?
If you still need help with choosing or setting up the best enrichment option for your company size data, I’m here to assist. Would you like to provide more details about what you’re trying to achieve or any specific challenges you’re facing?
Thanks! One more question — does the “Enrich Company with Companies, People, Jobs” action take the company’s domain into account when pulling data? For example, if I use a LinkedIn URL for a subsidiary, will it return the employee count of that specific entity, or the total headcount of the parent group?
The "Enrich Company with Companies, People, Jobs" action accepts a Company LinkedIn URL as input for highest accuracy. [1] When you provide a LinkedIn URL for a subsidiary, it should return data specific to that LinkedIn profile—meaning the subsidiary's employee count, not the parent company's total headcount.
The action pulls data directly from the LinkedIn company profile you provide, so using the subsidiary's unique LinkedIn URL will target that specific entity.
Is that what you were looking for?
If you need any further clarification or assistance with the "Enrich Company with Companies, People, Jobs" action or other enrichment options, I’m here to help. Would you like to share more about your use case or any other questions you have?
(and (neq {{Size (2)}} "Self-employed") (neq {{Size (2)}} "2-10") (neq {{Size (2)}} "11-50") (neq {{Size (2)}} "51-200") ) Why is this formula incorrect and what type of language do you use? Can you maybe correct this for me ?
Your formula uses incorrect syntax. Clay formulas use Clayscript (JavaScript-based language), not the syntax you've written. [1]
Corrected formula:
.png){kind=logo}
{{Size (2)}} != "Self-employed" && {{Size (2)}} != "2-10" && {{Size (2)}} != "11-50" && {{Size (2)}} != "51-200"Key changes:
This returns true when the company size is not any of those four values. [4]