Hi guys, I'm wanting to do a super specific Key contact search from a company and was wondering what the best way to go about it is. The "Find Contacts at Company" is doing an okay job but it is missing people out and I have no clue as to why. i have loads of key words I need to search for but this needs to be a profile wide search not just the job title. some of these companies are ~10,000 employees so needs to be as filtered as possible. Any help would be really appreciated.
To perform a highly specific, profile-wide key contact search at a large company in Clay, you can use our "Find People" feature. Here's how: 1. Use the "Source - Clay Find People" option. 2. Set your company attributes to narrow down to your target company. 3. Use multiple filters to broaden your search beyond job titles: • Job title: Include relevant titles and functions. • Experience: Search for keywords in experience descriptions. • Bio: Use keywords to search through headlines, about sections, and entire profiles. • Certifications: Include relevant certifications. 4. Preview and refine your results before importing to ensure you're capturing all relevant contacts. This approach allows for a comprehensive, profile-wide search to find key contacts even in large companies.
Hi Bailey! Do you mind sending the link (url) to the table so we can take a closer look here?
Using the Find contact within company but the data is sometimes pretty out of date
And sometimes pretty inaccurate as will display a different job title to the one they hold at the company hence the "exclude job title keywords" doesn't work
Any help or integration tips would be great thanks
Hey, If the contact search isn’t returning your keywords accurately, it’s likely because exact keyword matching isn’t enabled. You can check this by going to Enrich People search → Edit Column → Settings, and toggling on exact keyword match for job titles. By default, we use AI to interpret and group titles, which can explain some of the mismatches you’re seeing. If you’re noticing titles that seem outdated or inaccurate, feel free to share examples—I’d be happy to dig into it with you. Also, for more targeted results, you can try using Claygent. It searches across multiple sources online—including blogs and external databases—to find more accurate or hard-to-reach profiles. Here’s a quick video to help: https://cln.sh/pHgLKqxZ Let me know if you have more questions.
As you can see his current job is Director but the found job title is Senior Portfolio Manager.
I have the exact keyword match on aswell.
Hence my exclude keyword search would only effect there current job title not previous
However, this guy has been in the role for 3 months and he is appearing fine.
Very inconsistent and some profiles are not appearing at all.
Also how would i go about finding staff from a /school/ link on linkedin as this does not work
1 yr 9 mos in the current role and clay does not recognise it ?
Also why is this person appearing, they done even work at the linkedin company https://www.linkedin.com/company/dominionenergy/
Not a clue where this is from ??
Why is it not using his current role at the company I am searching?
Hey there Bailey thanks for sharing this, to clarify about these results, are they inside of the "Mikes" table or the "KC Finder" one. Want to check how the search is setup here.
Most were from "mikes"
Should be the same search though
Hey there Bailey quick question did you turn on the "Exact keyword match" before you initially ran the column or after wards? Checking the first example you give for Rich Matheson, he disappears if you rerun his cell again, since he does not match the keywords entered.
Just ran it again with the "Exact keyword match" on and he still appears. this was in the "mikes removed" sheet.
The issue with Rich was his current job title is not appearing and I initially had exclude "portfolio manager" as that's not the title I'm looking for.
He's currently a director and that is what I was looking for but the filters only affect the job title clay finds, which is not what he currently is.