Home
Events
Groups
Members

00 Clay Announcements
01 Community General
01 Props and Wins
01 Watercooler
01 Welcome and Intros
02 Bugs
02 Starting with Clay
02 Support
03 Feedback & Requests
03 Tutorials & Inspiration
04 FT Job Opps
Gtm Career Advice
Member Spotlight

Community Guidelines

Powered by Tightknit

01 Community General

01 Community General

Cost-effective Alternatives to Claygent for High-Volume Queries

·

·

is there a cheeper way then using Claygent, as chatgptmini does a very poor job in determening my prompt question but ClaygentNeon does an amazing job, using Neon is juts to expensive when doing 50.000 quaries, any suggestions?

Loading attachments

Cost-effective Alternatives to Claygent for High-Volume Queries | Clay

6 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Bharat D.
·
·
Get your own Anthropic or OpenAI API and link that to Clay.
Bharat D.
·
·
It's way cheaper!
Andi D.
·
·
first, ^ second, it's mostly your prompting. GPTmini works better at single step prompt vs multi. Also, use Claude to help with prompting and then ChatGPT to feed suggestions and double refine it.
Steven R.
·
·
ok when you say single step how woul dyou do it if you have a list of marketing agencies for example and you wan tto find out wich once have had clients in food and bevarage or aclholic brands indsutry, im not getting very good responses 🙂
Andi D.
·
·
that for example, should be 2 or even 3 step process -- 1. extract data from website (customers) 2. analyze the customers extract 3. categorization (this can be done via formula)
Taha
·
·
Steven R. Could you share sample data and more information on what you're trying to accomplish? I'd like to have a go at this and will let you know how it pans out.