Cost-effective Alternatives to Claygent for High-Volume Queries

is there a cheeper way then using Claygent, as chatgptmini does a very poor job in determening my prompt question but ClaygentNeon does an amazing job, using Neon is juts to expensive when doing 50.000 quaries, any suggestions?

6 comments

Bharat D.
·
·
Get your own Anthropic or OpenAI API and link that to Clay.
Bharat D.
·
·
It's way cheaper!
Andi D.
·
·
first, ^ second, it's mostly your prompting. GPTmini works better at single step prompt vs multi. Also, use Claude to help with prompting and then ChatGPT to feed suggestions and double refine it.
Steven R.
·
·
ok when you say single step how woul dyou do it if you have a list of marketing agencies for example and you wan tto find out wich once have had clients in food and bevarage or aclholic brands indsutry, im not getting very good responses 🙂
Andi D.
·
·
that for example, should be 2 or even 3 step process -- 1. extract data from website (customers) 2. analyze the customers extract 3. categorization (this can be done via formula)
Taha
·
·
Steven R. Could you share sample data and more information on what you're trying to accomplish? I'd like to have a go at this and will let you know how it pans out.