Home
Events
Groups
Members

00 Clay Announcements
01 Community General
01 Props and Wins
01 Watercooler
01 Welcome and Intros
02 Bugs
02 Starting with Clay
02 Support
03 Feedback & Requests
03 Tutorials & Inspiration
04 FT Job Opps
Gtm Career Advice
Member Spotlight

Community Guidelines

Powered by Tightknit

Cost-Effective Methods to Check Website Activity in Clay | Clay

01 Community General

01 Community General

Cost-Effective Methods to Check Website Activity in Clay

Matthew Humphreys

·

·

Hey All Is there a cost-effective way to run a website check in each row in Clay to check if a website is active or not? I have tested some Claygent prompts but it can be expensive with 10k rows! Thanks!!!

11 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Mitch M
·
·
Is claygent using a clay token per use, or an API call?
Muhammad
·
·
send a get request to home page anyting that returns 200 works - for all errored ones, you might want to run claygent
Matthew Humphreys
·
·
i'm running an API call using various GPT models but want to see if it can be done for free. How can i send a "get" request?
Muhammad
·
·
HTTP module send a get request to their home page https://www.clay.com
Muhammad
·
·
its an example, yo can dynamically put their URL in the http module
Matthew Humphreys
·
·
thanks a lot. makes sense. Im on the lower tier subscription so cant use this, but thanks anyway
Joel Sinclair-Horne
·
·
Yes there’s a free enrichment “Check if URL is Valid”
1
Hamid
·
·
200 response doesn't necessarily indicate that a domain is valid. A parked domain or domain with empty page would return 200 as well. I use Claygent with cheapest llm models. In the prompt I also instruct to if content of home page is relevant.
Sourabh
·
·
Matthew Humphreys I would be interested in knowing if this did work, also how much did it cost? In terms of plan upgrade and points used...
Muhammad
·
·
Hamid We need to use get request with some common sense bro 😂 jk, youre my man. Get request <> find the text <> ignore parked domains
Matthew Humphreys
·
·
Joel Sinclair-Horne Thanks a lot. I could not find this originally. Seems to work quite well as a basic search.
1