Hi everyone 👋, I just finished scraping and importing a list of about 600 local business emails into Clay. My Goal: I want to verify these emails to keep my bounce rate low, but I'd like to be efficient with my Clay credits. The Question: What is your current "go-to" setup for cost-effective verification? Do you use the native integrations (Debounce/Prospeo) inside Clay?
Or do you prefer bringing your own API key (e.g., Reoon, MillionVerifier, BounceBan) via the HTTP API column to save costs?
I’m looking for the best price-performance ratio for this type of data (local businesses). Any recommendations on which provider handles catch-all addresses best via API? Thanks!
For cost-effective email verification with local business emails, here are the top performers:
Best catch-all handlers:
- Kitt AI - 0.0015 credits, 91.33% quality, specifically designed for catch-all verification [1]
- Enrow - 0.002 credits, 91.22% quality
- Listmint - 0.004 credits, 91.83% quality
For your use case: Kitt AI offers the best price-performance ratio at just 0.0015 credits per lookup and handles catch-all domains well, which is crucial for generic info@ addresses. [2]
Clay's native integrations are typically more cost-effective than HTTP API setups since you avoid the overhead of managing external API keys and get optimized credit usage. [3]
Pro tip: Traditional verification tools often miss up to 50% of catch-all emails, so using a provider specifically designed for this (like Kitt AI or Enrichley) will give you better results for local business emails. [4]
Is that what you were looking for?
If you need any more help with email verification or optimizing your Clay credits, I’m here to assist. Would you like to share more details about your current setup or any specific challenges you’re facing?
but does kitt ai also very E-Mails if they are valid?
Yes, Kitt AI does both email finding and verification. It's described as an "Email Finder & Verifier" that helps find and verify B2B email addresses with a <0.1% bounce rate. [1]
It goes beyond traditional SMTP verification by checking emails against enterprise identity servers to detect job changes and verify catchalls, which makes it particularly good for the type of local business emails you're working with.
Did that answer your question?
so should I do a waterfall enrichment?
Yes, for your situation a waterfall enrichment makes perfect sense. Since you already have the emails, you'd set up an email verification waterfall rather than an email finding one.
The waterfall will try your first verification provider, and if it successfully verifies the email, it stops there - saving you credits. If that provider can't verify it, it moves to the next one automatically. [1]
This is exactly what you want for cost efficiency - you only pay for successful verifications and get credits refunded when providers can't verify an email. [2]
Just add the verification waterfall through "Add enrichment" and configure it with your preferred verification providers in order of cost-effectiveness.
Was this explanation helpful?
do you have a referral code for me when I sign up in trykitt ai
I don't have a referral code for Kitt AI since that's a separate service from Clay. However, we do have our own referral program!
You can get your Clay referral link by going to Settings > Referrals in your workspace. When someone signs up using your link and activates a paid account, you both get 3,000 Clay credits. [1]
For Kitt AI specifically, you'd need to check if they have their own referral program on their website.
Does this help?
If you still need help with email verification or setting up your enrichment workflow, I’m here to assist. Would you like to provide more details about what you’re trying to achieve or any challenges you’re facing?
