Jesse O.

Alex F. +1 with Mark B.. They have invested heavy resources recently within it's contact data, and the subscription options with Lusha are way more flexible than what Cognism requires.

JOY S. I prefer Lusha for enrichment & it natively integrates with Clay. Their MCP is super easy to set up with your LLM so you can do everything within the LLM chat window. As far as social signals website visitors has been working really well. There's plenty of others here though.

Here's a Lusha workflow that enriches company funding signals, specifically, that integrates with Clay. Cost-wise, it's a play before you pay model in case you aren't happy with the results. Hopefully that helps, Liron D.!

Super interesting thought pradyunmayap. I'm not really sure though. What about leveraging company keywords & specialties filters? Then layering intent signals on top of that

pradyunmayap Agreed with Tyee - it's a firmographics issue.Instead of a static headcount number, alternatives watch how headcount moves, so a pattern like international growth actually shows up. Lusha is my preference, but there are others you can look at. I know that they have custom triggers and signals that can help your filtering predicament.

Tom O. This test across various samples suggest Lusha has reliable US data. Janice C. They also integrate with Clay. According to their LinkedIn, there's a 35% off deal right now too fwiw

Lusha Kris C. - Free to test out too

swaroop m. Depends on what you're enriching. They have a pricing page that details further. Darshan Yeah, it's been super convenient not bouncing around tabs! As far as exporting vs. staying put, yes and no, depending on which other tools have a MCP