Cecil K.

I think it depends on a bunch of factors, but if a business can get more value out of nuanced workflows then it is! I believe in a competitive space, there is an advantage to be found versus companies using basic enrichment/signals. Clay gives you the means to specialize/optimize easily, whereas native CRM features are more likely to be rigid.

In a nutshell I'd say Clay gives you more flexibility versus what CRMs offer out of the box, allowing for more nuanced workflows

Everyone's racing to release their browser lol

Probably a matter of time though!

The main thing is that Comet lets me bring my old Chrome extensions, while Atlas doesn't. I tried some of the features in the release video (contextual actions on highlight) but seems like it's not available for me yet.

Same here, but I use the hotkeys a lot. I've also tried having it doing tasks, it's hit and miss so far. Sometimes it gives up on repetitive tasks.

Appreciate that Aleks, I'll reach out over DM!

Hi Aleksandar Z., we're working on a tool that can potentially help out with this through an API. It goes a bit further than external scrapers, and supports all the sources you listed. Would you want to try it out? We're currently testing it out to get feedback. Did you already have a table going in Clay? Curious how close you've gotten with Sculptor and AI columns.