Clay Icon

Improving Claygent Leads with Enhanced Validation Process

ยท
ยท

Sometimes the Claygent provides bad leads when asking it do research, but the fix to this is...

  1. 1.

    Source

  2. 2.

    Zenrows scrape of source (or ideally the original input so it doesn't cost as much)

  3. 3.

    Validate the data

I would love a baked in extra validation model in the Claygent (like two in one) that is like, "your only job is to verify what the first Claygent found and here is all the context and remove the bad stuff."

  • Avatar of Daniela D.
    Daniela D.
    ยท
    ยท

    Hey Jordan! Thanks for sharing. Happy to help. We're always looking to make the product better and this feedback is super helpful for us. We're going to pass this over to our product team so they can better evaluate things and see if/where this might fit into the roadmap as a future improvement. Also, If you have a few examples where this happened, happy to review this and share suggestions as well.

  • Avatar of Channeled
    Channeled
    APP
    ยท
    ยท

    Hey there - just wanted to check in here to see if you needed anything else! Feel free to reply back here if you do.

  • Avatar of Channeled
    Channeled
    APP
    ยท
    ยท

    We haven't heard back from you in a bit, so we're going to go ahead and close things out here - feel free to let us know if you still need something!

  • Avatar of Channeled
    Channeled
    APP
    ยท
    ยท

    Hi Jordan C.! This thread was recently closed by our Support team. If you have a moment, please share your feedback: