Best Practices for Handling Conflicting Data from Intent Providers | Clay

Best Practices for Handling Conflicting Data from Intent Providers

Hi, what do you do when there'[s different data for intent providers? How do you automatically decide what data is best? Is there a way to know source has been updated recently?

12 comments

kushagra t.
·
·
have an AI column which has instructions to decide which data is better, basically translate your manual process of choosing data into the prompt instruction
kushagra t.
·
·
if the instructions are more rule based than contextual then formulas can work too For example
tool 1: website visitors x
tool 2: website visitor y
formula - choose the higher number out of the two: x, y
Amit L.
·
·
Sorry, I wrote intent instead of enrichment. I meant enrichment - I don't know how to choose the most fresh data.
kushagra t.
·
·
ah, is there a specific enrichment you are trying to choose between? mostly it is running a few tests first on a few rows to test and see the data before choosing
Amit L.
·
·
My issue is that I am running Hubspot with Clearbit legacy, some apollo data and Clay to top it all. There are huge difference in data and Clay seems to be the freshest but I was wondering if there's a way to know that's not based on my anecdotal observations
Hari
·
·
If it's people data, almost all the providers pull the data from LinkedIn. Go ahead and use Clay's LinkedIn data as even Apollo, they refresh every few months which is not always up-to-date
kushagra t.
·
·
yeah if it's the linkedin data that you get from clay's enrichment then it also tells you the last refresh date
Amit L.
·
·
I didn't know that - What's the enrichment name ?
kushagra t.
·
·
Amit L.
·
·
Awesome - thank you so much!
1
Rafael G.
·
·
Sentrion.ai helps you find the highest-intent companies 🙂
1
noor
·
·
Amit L. u could try enrichminion.com for enrichment n stuff cuz it is like integrated w clay n hubspot as well so. and as far as kik it is reliable.
1