Troubleshooting GPT Mini Integration Errors for Advanced Reasoning Tasks | Clay

Troubleshooting GPT Mini Integration Errors for Advanced Reasoning Tasks

Hi there, I always get the error "The integration failed to run" & "❌ Invalid Request" for GPT o3 mini and o4 mini AI runs. The issue is that I want to use these models for a task they would be very well suited to as it involves advanced reasoning. I have already tried increasing the token budget to like 10 credits but that did not help. My kind of guess is the output format I am requiring as it is a json object with up to 3 arrays that contain fields on their own. For other models such as claude 4 sonnet it's no problem at all. This is the link to the table: https://app.clay.com/workspaces/424789/workbooks/wb_0svufuqGmwyJZSMKUyr/tables/t_0syelfpx2EnMCE8i457/views/gv_0syelfpb5ao46gsFXxF

5 comments

Clay
APP
·
·
The "Invalid Request" error with GPT o3/o4 mini models using JSON output is likely due to JSON formatting issues. These models are stricter about JSON syntax than Claude. Common causes: ** Missing commas between key-value pairs ** Unescaped quotes in strings ** Trailing commas after last items ** Missing quotes around keys * Incorrect data types To troubleshoot, please copy and paste your JSON output format into this chat so I can identify the specific formatting issue.
Sources: FAQ: Why am I seeing the "failed to parse body" error when using the HTTP API enrichment? HTTP API integration overview | Documentation | Clay University
Maximilian J.
·
·
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "lost_reasons": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "rank": {"type": "integer" }, "category": { "type": "string" }, "sub_category": { "type": "string" }, "lost_reason": { "type": "string"}, "evidence": { "type": "string" }, "why_final": { "type": "string" }, "reasoning_for_the_ranking_of_the_categories": {"type": "string" } }, "required": [ "rank", "category", "sub_category", "lost_reason", "evidence", "why_final","reasoning_for_the_ranking_of_the_categories" ], "additionalProperties": false } } }, "required": [ "lost_reasons" ],"additionalProperties": false }
Stefano
·
·
Hi Maximilian, thank you for reaching out. It seems like your query ran succesfully and contains all the fields you were looking for:
(690 kB)
Could you please be more specific as to what the issue is if not? I want to make sure I can help you and any clarification that could lead me in the right direction would be appreciated!
Maximilian J.
·
·
Hi Stefano I have changed the models to something like claude 3.7 and gpt 4.1. I think it was due to some json output formatting that made the agent error out
Daniel K.
·
·
I think you might have what you need here, so I'll tentatively mark this closed for the moment. Please keep in touch if you hit other roadblocks!