You could try the Facebook Groups scraper on Apify. Clay has a built-in integration with Apify. This one does have a monthly fee, but 7 day free trial with a platform subscription. https://apify.com/apify/facebook-groups-scraper?fpr=8e9l1
You could try the built-in Apify integration and try one of the TikTok scrapers there such as this one: https://apify.com/clockworks/tiktok-scraper?fpr=8e9l1 Note: some of the Apify scrapers are free to use with a platform subscription, but this one requires a monthly fee, but with a 4 day free trial.
Hi Emma W. - I created an Apify actor that allows you to call any API similar to Clay's HTTP API feature to work around this limitation. Since Clay integrates natively with Apify, this provides similar functionality. The main difference is that it could be slower since there is a hop from Clay to Apify to whatever API you are calling, but it runs fast for simple calls. https://apify.com/xyzzy/http-api?fpr=8e9l1. It requires an Apify plan, and has a one day free trial, then monthly fee after that, but much cheaper than upgrading your version.
Ok then it鈥檚 a tradeoff of cost vs coverage. If the TAM is huge and cost is a concern, then maybe you don鈥檛 need complete coverage of emails for every contact. You can afford to skip more of the contacts that don鈥檛 have an email match, just move on to the next contact.
You could try FullEnrich. Costs more per contact, but they aggregate multiple providers. The only issue is that they have an asynchronous API so it's tricky to use via Clay enrichments/webhooks. Alternatively, you could enrich outside of Clay and import. I haven't tested this at large scale, but it is matching a lot more contacts in my tests.
No, the way I presented it is confusing. Of all the 1,000 emails where an email was found, it was from those two providers. However, there were many additional records with no email found.
