Gabriel K.

Yeah it does, its more so for the enrichment costs that run when for example the first 4 didnt give back any results, this since we have quite a lot of contacts that need to be enriched daily, so we try to understand the cost for unfindables as good as possible. but ill try to get in contact with Sales since we will upgrade our package

Yeah, Iveta we started with Zeliq and Forager since these give the most results for us. afterwards some of the cheaper vendors, and the most expensive ones as a last resort. but since the output of the cheaper vendors is very low we want to consider taking them out, but this depends if we get charged (and till what extend)

we currently have: Zeliq Forager Prospeo LeadMagic Wiza Datagma ContactOut People Data Labs ZoomInfo (Via API) BetterContact, we use it in the order given

which providers charge for API calls?

Yeah for the ones where we do actually have an API key we use it, but we currently run phone number enrichment, the costs we can indeed see in the panel, we just want to make sure for which ones we get creditet and which ones we dont when there isnt a found number, so we know if we can add more venders and in which order

Partially, when charged for the API call, will this be the same amount as the enrichment credit amount or will this be lower, if so where can we find this info. we want to make sure we setup our waterfall as efficient as possible.

Alright, thank you! I’ll give this some trial and error with the existing customer base to see if the numbers match up.

We’re looking to target retailers and e-commerce businesses within the Benelux. We’re currently trying to assess the TAM for one of our clients, so the benchmark for the number of products still needs to be defined. That said, we can only set this benchmark if we’re confident that we can accurately determine the number of products on each website. The benchmark will probably be on the higher end in terms of product count, since that makes more sense ROI-wise.