Sourabh

Ariel — for MSPs it’s tricky since they usually don’t publish their client-side stack. Beyond BuiltWith, you can sometimes get hints by checking job openings (roles mentioning specific tools), or even looking at employee LinkedIn profiles where they list platforms they work with (e.g. “managing CrowdStrike” or “monitoring via Datto”). We’ve helped clients do this kind of enrichment at scale — combining job boards, LinkedIn signals, and tech lookup tools to build a clearer picture of target accounts. Happy to share how we approach it. Best, Sourabh - GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

Eryk — great question. A lot of teams run into that “channel collision” issue when email + LinkedIn aren’t sequenced right. A good approach is to set clear rules of engagement in Clay (e.g. only move a prospect to LinkedIn if no email reply after X days) and then use tags or triggers to avoid overlap. We’ve built multi-channel flows in Clay + Instantly + HeyReach for clients, so the outreach stays coordinated rather than competing. If you’d like, I can share a framework we use that keeps campaigns smooth without over-touching prospects. Best, Sourabh - GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

Hunter — my team and I can jump in here. We manage high-volume e-commerce email campaigns (4k+/month sends) including segmentation, deliverability, design, and flows. Already handle Klaviyo/HubSpot setups for ecom brands and can provide full-time, hands-on support. Happy to connect and share case studies if you’d like. Best, Sourabh - GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

That’s a solid workflow! One way to handle this in Clay is to set up a layered enrichment sequence instead of just one waterfall. For example: Pull founders first → check for email. If no founder email, run a “find people” step for co-founder/C-level → email lookup. If still empty, fall back to Sales/BD titles. That way you’re always backfilling until each company has at least one reachable contact. We’ve helped a few Clay users set up similar multi-tiered flows and even added some light manual QA/enrichment to maximize coverage without burning too many credits. If you’d like, happy to share how we usually structure this. Best, Sourabh – GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

Hi Caitlin 👋 That’s a really smart event-prep idea! I’ve seen teams use Clay + light dev support to spin up personalized landing pages for accounts/attendees — usually combining company info, ICP signals, and event-relevant messaging. The key is blending Clay’s enrichment with a templated web page framework so it scales without being too manual. If you’d like, our team has built similar workflows for event-driven campaigns and could share examples — happy to connect and walk you through what’s worked well. Best, Sourabh – GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

Welcome, Kennadi! 🎉 Clay can be a game-changer once you get the hang of it. We’ve helped a few teams (new to Clay) streamline enrichment + reduce credit usage with some smart workflows and light QA. If you ever want a quick walkthrough or examples of what’s worked well, happy to share! Best, Sourabh Asawa – GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

Hi Andy, Welcome! We’ve helped a few Clay users with similar workflows by blending automation with some light manual QA or custom enrichment when needed. In a lot of cases, we also help reduce Clay credit usage by optimizing enrichment logic, so you get more output without burning through credits. If you ever feel like you’re hitting Clay’s limits or just need an extra pair of hands, happy to show you what we do. Best, Sourabh Asawa – GTM Expert (panopticanalytics.com)

Veena P. Yeah, Clay caps at 100 reactions per post right now. A workaround is layering it with LinkedIn’s own APIs or scraping to pull the full set, then piping that data back into Clay. We’ve set this up for a few clients—happy to share how if you want. 🚀 Best, Sourabh Panoptic Analytics panopticanalytics.com sourabh@panopticanalytics.com LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sourabh85/

Great question, Alan 👋 — that overlap in LinkedIn experiences is a pretty common challenge. Most enrichment tools will just grab the latest listed role, which isn’t always the true “primary” company. One workaround is to pair the LinkedIn URL with a company domain or firmographic filter (instead of just the experience list). That way, the system can match against both the profile and the right org, rather than defaulting to whatever’s on top. We’ve tackled this in client projects by building custom enrichment logic — prioritizing the target company you care about and filtering out side gigs like BNI or advisory roles. Happy to share how we set this up if that’d be useful. 🚀 Best, Sourabh sourabh@panopticanalytics.com LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sourabh85/