Robert Isho

I wanted to share some feedback about a feature that would be incredibly helpful for users managing multiple systems or client workspaces. Imagine I’ve built a system — for example, an inbox management system or a follow-up engine — and I need to replicate that setup across multiple clients. Right now, I can create separate tables or systems for each client, but the issue is keeping them aligned. If I make a change to the main system’s table (like adding or renaming a column), I have to manually apply that same change across every client’s table. This becomes inefficient and prone to errors, especially when managing multiple clients. It would be amazing if Clay supported some way to sync or mirror table structures — so that updates to the main system automatically propagate to linked or cloned systems. This would make managing multi-client setups far smoother and more scalable.

Error loading sidebar: Request failed with status code 404

One of the biggest issues I’ve experienced with Clay is the inability to easily export all the current prompt configurations from a table in a clean, structured way. While exporting the table as a CSV includes prompt columns, the current process is tough, espeically when working with multiple prompt columns across large tables. In Clay, the order and content of prompt columns are obviously important to keeping workflows stable and understandable, but there's no native way to view or back up all prompt logic in a centralized or easily editable format. A dedicated "Export Prompts" function or structured prompt export view (similar to column schema export) would go a long way in helping users manage, debug, and replicate prompt workflowsin their AI threads. This feels like a foundational feature that is missing.

Would be sick if the clay builder would allow for multiple model runs at the same time, that way I can compare and contrast to what the actual truth is (my own viewing). See pic of openrouter for some inspiration.

have a pretty large list I'm working with (over 10k contacts) but it's been like this for more than 24 hours.

I’d like to see an easier way to automatically split contacts by company into buckets or lists according to specific rules. For example, I frequently need to assign the first two contacts from each company to a “List 1,” then place the third contact on “List 2,” the fourth on “List 3,” and so on, ensuring that each contact appears in only one list. Currently, this requires manual workarounds with formulas and filtering, which can be confusing and time-consuming. It would be extremely valuable to have a built-in feature for dynamic contact bucketing based on group order or position within a company, making workflows like outreach sequencing much faster and more user-friendly. Thanks for considering this improvement!

Deleted