Comparing Accuracy of Work Email Enrichment Methods

Which enrichment is more accurate when finding work emails -> (1) work email which only requires full name and company domain or (2) work email (enterprise) which requires the same and linkedin profile?

3 comments

Channeled
APP
·
·
Generally, using full name, company domain, and LinkedIn profile is more accurate for finding work emails. This method provides more data points, increasing the chances of finding the correct email. Our Find Work Email action allows you to input: 1. Full Name 2. Company Domain (optional) 3. Social Profile URL (optional, including LinkedIn) Including the LinkedIn profile URL can significantly improve accuracy, as it provides additional verification of the person's identity and current employment. We use a waterfall enrichment process, which tries multiple providers to maximize data coverage. The primary input required is the Company Domain, but ideally, you should also include Personal Social Profile URLs for best results. Remember, we offer various data providers for finding work emails, each with its own strengths. You can customize the order of these providers in your enrichment waterfall for optimal results.
Sources: Fullenrich integration overview | Documentation | Clay University Enrich People (Waterfalls) [Clay 101] - Clay University Data points: Contact Email - Work | Clay.com
Channeled
APP
·
·
This thread was picked up by our in-app web widget and will no longer sync to Slack. If you are the original poster, you can continue this conversation by logging into https://app.clay.com and clicking "Support" in the sidebar. If you're not the original poster and require help from support, please post in 02 Support.
Summiya B.
·
·
Use "find mail" enrichment which only use domain and full name.