Alternative Ways to Enrich Contacts with LinkedIn Profiles | Clay

Alternative Ways to Enrich Contacts with LinkedIn Profiles

Hi Support team, I'm trying to enrich a list of contacts with LinkedIn profiles. I've been using the Claygent LinkedIn Profile URL search, but my success rate is 50%, and that's the lowest I've gotten when running this enrichment. Is there an alternative enrichment I can try to find the person's LinkedIn profile?

13 comments

Kam
·
·
This is the workbook https://app.clay.com/workspaces/304869/workbooks/wb_z5HChofA7aSg/tables/t_VHTXHM3mDrJ9/views/gv_oWqEaRG3Q2F6
Channeled
APP
·
·
👋 Hey there! Our support team has got your message - we'll be back in touch within 24 hours (often sooner!). If you haven't already, please include the URL of your table in this thread so that we can help you as quickly as possible!
Tanvi R.
·
·
Hi Kam, thanks for reaching out! I just took a look at your account and see you ran out of credits! Just added 3000 credits to your account. Taking a look at your table to see how we can find more LinkedIn profiles for you
Tanvi R.
·
·
Hey Kam, so Claygent is the best approach here to find the most LinkedIn profile urls. Interesting that you got a 50% success rate with the find LinkedIn url Claygent template, I just duplicated this column and plugged your prompt into the Claygent metaprompter shown below. This new column is called "Revised Find LinkedIn URL prompt" and you can see this prompt performs significantly better (17/20 LinkedIns found vs. 6/20 from the first column). Another change I made that also had a significant impact was defining the column outputs - I specified LinkedIn urls as the output to help the AI better output the correct results. I definitely recommend defining your outputs for any of your Claygent prompts as it really makes a big difference with your results. https://downloads.intercomcdn.com/i/o/w28k1kwz/1228979651/162382855fe27763d69ba050ff6f/CleanShot+2024-10-25+at+10_52_05%402x.png?expires=1729870200&signature=79985039cfd2e591c34adf399045703620c49f1da42194c4d8e0a7381272b303&req=dSIlHsB5lIdaWPMW1HO4zTXKeYfP%2BLSyK1F8Z3lTk1JaHS9%2B9tUiVFD3t3nO%0AhmhJ%0A I'm refunding the Claygent credits back for the 18,100 rows that did not find results so you can run the revised Claygent column. Once you've finished running this column, you can create a *merge column*to merge your outputs with the original Claygent column. Give this a try and let me know how your success rate improves!
Kam
·
·
Hi Tanvi R., this is great. Thank you so much! I'll finish running the table now. I appreciate your very fast response to my query!
Tanvi R.
·
·
Our pleasure Kam! I share this feedback with our team about the metaprompter prompt performing better than the Claygent template and they asked for more information. I just added 60K credits to your account to compare the old column vs new column results so consider these enrichments on us! Thanks for reaching out and prompting our curiosity :)
Kam
·
·
Hi Tanvi R., This is awesome! I will leave the workbook and pick it back up on Monday. Would you be able to let me know when you've finished reviewing? I will likely save the template you made to use in the future so thank you for that too!
Tanvi R.
·
·
Hey Jam, yes I'll let you know when the enrichments are done running! It'll be finished by the end of today!
Tanvi R.
·
·
*Kam apologies for the earlier misspelling! Going to keep looking at your table over the weekend, I'll get back to you Monday!
Kam
·
·
Hi Tanvi, thank you for the update. Please let me know when it will be okay for me to go in the workbook!
Tanvi R.
·
·
Hey Kam, it looks like the enrichments finished running so you can go back into the workbook! Let me know if you have any other questions!
👍1
Kam
·
·
Thank you Tanvi R., much higher success rate with the revised search!
Channeled
APP
·
·
Hi Kam! This thread was recently closed by our Support team. If you have a moment, please share your feedback: