I need to know Point of Sale (POS) system a company is using, something I expect to be able to find based on the website. Now, when I use Claygent and run this prompt "Visit /domain and check which Point of Sale (POS) or eCommerce system they use. Return only the name (e.g. “Shopify POS”, “Lightspeed Retail”). Leave blank if you cannot find this information." it doesn't give any output, keeps "polishing" and "calibrating". I can also use Add enrichment/Builtwith but that costs me 2 credits per row (and I expect about 1000 rows need to be checked). Any advise here, how to do this most cost-efficiently?
For cost-effective POS/eCommerce system identification at scale, use HG Insights integration instead of Claygent. HG Insights can identify technology stacks including payment processors and eCommerce platforms that companies use behind the scenes, even when not publicly mentioned on websites. Set up the Get company tech stack action by searching for specific technologies like "Shopify POS", "Square", or "Stripe" in the Products field. Alternatively, try Store Leads integration which specializes in eCommerce platform data and offers both company enrichment and search capabilities specifically for online retail technology stacks. Both options should be more reliable and cost-effective than Claygent for this specific use case across 1000 domains.
"HG Insights" integration is 8 cents per row, thats not economical, no?
You're right that HG Insights at 8 cents per row isn't economical for 1000 rows. Unfortunately, the sources don't mention BuiltWith pricing or other cost-effective alternatives for POS/eCommerce detection. For your Claygent issue, try refining your prompt to be more specific about where to look (footer, checkout pages, payment sections) or break it into smaller batches to avoid the "polishing" timeout. HG Insights excels at finding "back of house" technologies that aren't visible on websites, but for publicly visible POS systems, you might need to stick with Claygent troubleshooting or accept the BuiltWith cost if it's more reliable than the current Claygent results.
