As you can see I only get 3 people out of 24 displayed on the company linkedin people section
Hey Loic, thanks for reaching out! Do you mind sending the link to the table so we can take a look? https://downloads.intercomcdn.com/i/o/1171717996/ac7729f84b426e1d0358af02/image.png?expires=1731348900&signature=a4308f7164fa9207bf53e662cf4efef040bfd4ff3a1edc0991e9744f803cba5e&req=dSEgF85%2FmohWX%2FMW1HO4zYTywSr%2FAp8f2BKsam%2FhVPvZVA%3D%3D%0A
Hi Owen, Here is the table : https://app.clay.com/workspaces/156544/tables/t_gVtxGGnyU9JA/views/gv_ereo7YSvYm2e Thanks for checking it out
For now it is not a problem if the conditions are not met to run the flow but I want the count to be exact in order to do this at scale if possible
To clarify, Clay doesn’t receive data directly from LinkedIn, but rather through third-party data providers that source information from LinkedIn. The discrepancy you're seeing might be due to overlapping job functions that the 24 LinkedIn-listed employees have self-identified. For instance, on the location section of the same page, it shows that these 24 publicly associated members are based in France, with further breakdowns by specific cities and areas. The "job function" filter may only capture roles where it's 100% certain that the position falls under the "Engineering" category. If you're looking to scale this analysis, I’d recommend testing with a few other companies to compare results. Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions :)
Okey thanks for the answer and helping me out, i'll try to stick with phantombuster and plug it into clay right after in that case ;)
Hey there - just wanted to check in here to see if you needed anything else! Feel free to reply back here if you do.
We haven't heard back from you in a bit, so we're going to go ahead and close things out here - feel free to let us know if you still need something!