Generating Profile URLs for Named Individuals - Best Integration for Accuracy Without Exact Company Identifier | Clay

02 Support

Generating Profile URLs for Named Individuals - Best Integration for Accuracy Without Exact Company Identifier

Raymond J.

Need help:

1.
I have a name + title data set

a.
I need to find and generate the profile URLs of these people
b.
data point to ensure the accuracy of profile URLs is through a certain 1st degree connection between my personal account and these profiles to find

Any best integration to use? For reference: have tried the enrich profile options but it's giving me a general result since I don't have the exact company for identifier. Data points will be name, occupation, and a connection of's.

6 comments

Clay Team
APP
·
·
Hey there Raymond sorry for the delay, could you post a link to your table so I can take a look?
Raymond J.
·
·
Here it is: https://app.clay.com/workspaces/199281/tables/t_V94l6ZLNf6BT/views/gv_fxtHy6QNSw31 For reference: data points which we should use in generating profile urls are : name, title, and a connection of the exact profile attached.
Clay Team
APP
·
·
Hey there sorry for the long delay, taking a look now.
Clay Team
APP
·
·
So looking at your table it seems as though you have generated LinkedIn profiles, are these results you were trying to get?
Raymond J.
·
·
I'm able to generate the urls but we wanted to make sure that they are the right contacts by validating that they are indeed a direct connection of https://www.linkedin.com/in/johanskold/ It's possible for phantom to do that after syncing with my personal LI session cookie. Question is: do Clay have the same claygent/integration without going through rerunning those LI urls again to phantom and do all processes within Clay?
Clay Team
APP
·
·
Hey there Raymond, sorry for the long delay. There is a video by that shows something similar to this, I will send it to you. https://youtu.be/xiUPLOpsL1Q?si=YTASMHdBhaxEJDCs But in this case Claygent would be the closes that you could get to pulling this off, but it's not a guarantee and would require a very detailed prompt.