Comparison of Deepseek V3 and GPT 4o-mini for Lead Enrichment

We don't have specific information about the pricing of Deepseek V3 or GPT 4o-mini for lead enrichment in Clay. Our platform allows access to 100+ external enrichment tools in a central, credit-based marketplace. We offer AI-based enrichment options, including integration with OpenAI/GPT, but the specific models you mentioned aren't listed in our current information. To get the most cost-effective option for lead enrichment, have you considered using our waterfall feature? It allows you to search multiple enrichment tools in order and only pay once a result is found, potentially reducing costs. What specific type of lead information are you looking to enrich?

Sources: OpenAI/GPT x Clay integration | Clay.com FAQ | Clay.com

Hey there, thanks for your message! We recently onboarded openai's new 4.1 series of models:

Specifically gpt 4.1 mini and nano will quite cheap to operate with your personal API key. Let me know if this helps!

For DeepSeek models, you won’t be able to use your personal API key, as we rely on an external inference provider for those. However, you can use your personal key with any of the other foundational model integrations and select the model that best fits your desired balance between cost and output quality.

This will depend on the inference provider you'll be using to integrate with Deepseek - can you share some context on what pricing model you're referencing when making the decision on what solution to implement? As for 4o-mini's pricing model, you can find details for pricing here: https://openai.com/api/pricing/