Thanks for looking into it, Tanvi. I want to take data from the first table and ideally have all the data in the other table in a more compact form. Because if I have to map out each individual data point, I’m going to be lazy to do it and I’m also going to optimize and conserve like columns. Because the whole reason I’m putting it into another table is that I don’t have enough space to run a waterfall in the original table. And also it’s good practice to do the enrichment over there. But then I realized, for example, when I do the export from the table where I run the enrichment, what I’m actually doing is export that and do a VLOOKUP in Google Sheets in order to associate the emails I found with all of the data I have in the original scoring table. This is by no means a crazy thing to do, but I could avoid that and just create the perfect export table right inside of clay if I could pull in the original data from the first table. Because then I can map this stuff out in the second table once I know what I need. Does this make sense?
.png&w=3840&q=75){kind=logo}
