Hey, Iβm using lookup row in a table to see how many rows I have in the same table with the same company name. Iβm getting Cell exceeds max rows, even if I set a limit of 100 or 10 Iβm getting it. What might be the issue?
Thanks Bo (.. The issue is that Iβm using some of the columns as βtext holdersβ for reference by other columns. I donβt βneedβ that information to be part of the table for every row but I didnβt find a different solution for it so far. Regardless of that , I want to run a few company validations and I want to run them once per company, regardless of how many people I have at the same company so Iβm running the lookup enrichment to make sure Iβm running the tests only on the first instance of a company and then Iβm replicating the results for the other instances. The issue is that I canβt get the instance count for companies that have more than ~3 instances. I donβt need the βheavyβ data meaning the cells with all the text to be part of the lookup but I donβt think thereβs a way to go around that. Hope this clarifies and give you something to work with for a clever solution π
Didnβt help π
Also the weird thing is that all rows have the same extra βadditional dataβ but still some manage to run the duplicate find and others donβt. See for example row 29 & 30 that are running while rows 31 & 32 arenβt
I see you are doing some stuff, let me know when I can play again π
hmm interesting , Iβll see how I can use that and update, thanks!
Thanks! We've reopened this thread. You can continue to add more detail directly in this thread.
Bo (. after looking at it a bit more I donβt think this will work. To clarify my use cases. For the first time I run this column, Iβm looking to find the first instance of the company to run the enrichments only on it. But after I complete the enrichment Iβm running the look up enrichment again to populate for all the duplicate rows the values that I have enriched for row 1. As far as I can understand, with your solution, this isnβt possible, hopefully Iβm wrong and you can guide me to it π
Hey Aviv! Thanks for reaching out. In this instance, I recommend adding a second Lookup column. This will help with avoiding an infinite loop, as the primary function for the first lookup column is to tag the duplicate records based on their position in the table. With a second Lookup column, you'll be able to extract enriched values from the first item in the array. I made a quick video showing how to navigate this: https://share.cleanshot.com/61w5ZsnB Also sharing an additional video to help you get more familiar with ensuring enrichments run for the first instance of a record in your table: https://www.loom.com/share/a39a4569d95244b7886026f3c70812c7 Let me know if this helps!
We haven't heard back from you in a bit, so we're going to go ahead and close things out here - feel free to let us know if you still need something!
Thanks! We've reopened this thread. You can continue to add more detail directly in this thread.
