Simplifying Job Search: Combining Company List and Openings into One Table

Hi, I had a request about finding job openings (here is the loom). As of now, I have to build the company list first and then find a job opening, which requires doing two Clay tables. It would be great if everything could be done into only one CLAY table.

8 comments

Channeled
APP
·
·
You can use Approach #1 in Clay to find job openings and build your company list in a single table. Here's how: 1. Start with the "Find Jobs" source in your workbook: • Open the Sources modal • Select "Find Jobs" as your starting point • Enter your job search criteria (titles, keywords) • Refine using location, job type, and other filters This approach will give you a single table containing both the job openings and their corresponding companies. From there, you can: ** Further enrich the company data using waterfalls ** Add more company information as needed ** Find key people at these organizations Pro Tips: ** Include various permutations of job titles since Clay doesn't have semantic search ** Start with broad filters and narrow down gradually ** Remember Google jobs has a 4-keyword maximum per search * Iterate and adjust your search parameters if needed
Source: Find Jobs Source + Enrichment [Clay 101] - Clay University
Channeled
APP
·
·
Is that what you were looking for?
Channeled
APP
·
·
Hi Giorgio Z.! This thread was recently closed by our Support team. If you have a moment, please share your feedback:
Channeled
APP
·
·
Thank you so much for sharing your feedback Giorgio Z.!
Channeled
APP
·
·
Thanks! We've reopened this thread. You can continue to add more detail directly in this thread.
Arturo O.
·
·
Hey Giorgio, thanks for reaching out and sharing the loom! This makes sense and we certainly have it on the roadmap to incorporate company-level filters for Find Jobs. Stay tuned for updates, but don't have a final ETA just yet! :D
Channeled
APP
·
·
Hi Giorgio Z.! This thread was recently closed by our Support team. If you have a moment, please share your feedback:
Giorgio Z.
·
·
ok perfect, thanks for the response, Arturo O.