Inconsistencies in Clay's LinkedIn Company Enrichment Data Structures

noticing some differing data structures from clay's linkedin company enrichment, is there a reason for the inconsistency? This has downstream impacts for us so would like to know if we should expect this for all future records or if this is some sort of bug

9 comments

Parth P.
·
·
Channeled
APP
·
·
👋 Hey there! Our support team has got your message - we'll be back in touch within 24 hours (often sooner!). If you haven't already, please include the URL of your table in this thread so that we can help you as quickly as possible!
Parth P.
·
·
https://app.clay.com/workspaces/4711/tables/t_N6oYGfK7itQi/views/gv_QbcXTu29pKwU
Bo (.
·
·
Hey, thanks for reaching out - Curious about what kind of inconsistencies you’re referring to? I’ve noticed differences in the data itself but not in the field names. Could you share what specific issues you’ve been facing? I’d be happy to help you resolve them! 😊
Parth P.
·
·
Yes sorry thats what i mean, some records have *more data points than others
Parth P.
·
·
just curious as to why some have the data points and others don't have the data points at all as opposed to just having the data point with a null value for consistency
Bo (.
·
·
The data might not be valid due to various reasons. When setting up a page, adding data isn’t mandatory, so some may leave it incomplete. Smaller pages may not require all data points, and some entries could be missing details. There’s a wide range of reasons for these gaps. If you’re looking for specific data about certain companies, I can help you explore workarounds to ensure you’re not held back.
Channeled
APP
·
·
We haven't heard back from you in a bit, so we're going to go ahead and close things out here - feel free to let us know if you still need something!
Channeled
APP
·
·
Hi Parth P.! This thread was recently closed by our Support team. If you have a moment, please share your feedback: