Gonzalo B.

One more question, is it normal to get outputs that are opposite to the reasoning?? The reasoning clearly states that it should be marked as "No.1".. but the output is "yes"

Ok, I'll try adding the web search too. Should I worry about the length of the prompt with GPt3.5?

Would it be better if I run a website scrape first and then a claygent on the bodytext of it?

I used the web search with claygent prior to the Seo_description, but the outputs weren't accurate. Even with the same prompt and model, after running it more than once, I received opposite outputs (I guess it varies depending on the web scan it does).

https://app.clay.com/workspaces/43335/tables/t_A1XPNRvsRueh/views/gv_3pokbcMp6wrf

Is it normal to have such different results between models?? The first column with 3.5 missed almost all the unsuitable. 4.0 was more accurate. My prompt with 3.5 worked better than yours 🤔

Thanks, Osman. I'll try it!

I don't think it understands the line "Analyze if it’s a company worth targeting for our custom software development and design services firm" It continues marking "Yes" companies that are competitors and offer the same dev/design services

Scrape the following website: /website. Analyze if it’s a company worth targeting for our custom software development and design services firm. If they have an app, platform, portal or marketplace, then it’s a good fit and mark it as Yes. If they don't mark no. If it is an Agency or Studio mark Agency. Any company that specializes or offers services related to Web Development, Product Development, Mobile App development, software development, software solutions, custom development, IT solutions, consulting, advertising or Marketing mark as NO.

columns: Target Worthiness & Prospect Evaluation