Matt Brooks

Ah, right, that's it! We have on auto de-dupe and it deleted the row automatically, thanks!!!

That's your response, not our request Muhammad Here's a 9:45 AM ET log in which it worked (the row exists in the table I linked to above)

we can't just run all stale data again and pay 2 credits (that could be 1500+ credits for something)

Hey Bo (Clay), the graph can't be panned/scrolled so I have no idea what data is actually stale

Okay, thanks, I'll just create columns for the data I want to move over. I thought my data was stuck in this lookup table thus I would have to re-enrich

Dang... I tried a shortcut with a deduped lookup table but just saw that the lookup doesn't supply the full enrichment/object? First, why is that? Severely limits the lookup feature Second, is there any way I can get back the 500 credits I just wasted?

Man, I've got to create:

That's a crazy flow. It solves my problem but I'd be surprised if this constraint doesn't come up a lot. It would be great to have a feature: "Same inputs as a previous row, push the already found output"

Okay, I understand. That's kind of crappy in this case, but it's clear. Follow-up question, if I run the enrichment over 10 rows but the inputs are the same for 5 of the rows (so of course the outputs will be the same), why am I charged for all 10 credits? There is no history/caching/check to see if the data has already been requested and enriched? Do I really have to go through the really annoying effort of creating a separate table with duplicates removed and then a lookup table to only have to pay 1 credit per company?