Aditi S.

Hi Andrew - thanks so much for reaching out and for your patience here. I believe this was a UI glitch and thanks for flagging, but seems it has now been fixed. Let us know if you have any more questions here

^We have a few built in features at the column level to help you with this, you don't have to use Claygent, but you can if you'd like to ​

I took a closer look with my team member and see that when you run this source: ​

In the original table, this is pulling more than 50K records, and we have a 50K record source limit. So if the source you've run in a table has pulled 50K records, no new rows will get added in. The only workaround here is what I initially suggested and what you have now done, which is to recreate the source in a new table.

Hope that clarifies things and sorry for the confusion on this. ​

Totally understand - I just tried re-running the source from a workbook level and seemed like it pulled in the new objects, but I am noticing that you are about to hit the table limit here:

Hi Dan - thanks so much for reaching out and for your patience here. Could you say more about what you mean about it not updating correctly? I notice that these specific sources need to be manually run - have you tried manually running these and noticed an issue?

After the object is created, you'll be able to see the ID like so:

If you'd like more intensive data about these records, you should then be able to run a "Lookup Object" action to get more information if you need it. ​

Hi Alexandre - thanks so much for reaching out. Just wanted to clarify here, we don't have a single column that can do both actions. You'd have to have two separate columns to do this:

Hi Ruben - thanks so much for reaching out. Understood that these results aren't returning what you'd like and that adding the formula is creating a circular error. ​

Wondering if this could be solved if we be stricter with the Job Titles operator. Instead of "Any of," we can test "All of" to see if you get better responses this way

I just force ran the row and it seemed to have worked now: ​

I wonder if this would be easier if you create a column with the static tag assigned as you have done for the dynamic column. Then I believe when we add in the tags here:

It should work as expected ​