Concerns About LinkedIn Enrichment Accuracy with BuiltWith Data

Panos S. · 2025-03-17T15:36:14.825Z

Got an issue with linkedin enrichment from Clay when i'm exporting companies from Builtwith. Most of the domains (from builtwith) are invalid, yet when I do linkedin enrichment Clay is able to find a linkedin profile. I can see some inconsistencies with the domain from the linkedin enrichment VS the root domain from builtwith. Can anyone share some insights here? Should I trust the linkedin enrichment?

Concerns About LinkedIn Enrichment Accuracy with BuiltWith Data | Clay

Panos S.
·
·
Loading attachments
Panos S.
·
·
Company table: https://app.clay.com/workspaces/312220/workbooks/wb_4ZpUaJRZ6Vhu/tables/t_T7hBbpbss9Dn/views/gv_k2XgC5aEtYZG
Channeled
APP
·
·
When there are inconsistencies between the domain from LinkedIn enrichment and the root domain from BuiltWith, it's best to consider both sources of information carefully. LinkedIn enrichment in Clay is generally reliable, but discrepancies can occur due to various factors. To get the most accurate data: 1. Double-check the input data for the BuiltWith enrichment. 2. Ensure you're using the full URL for LinkedIn enrichment, including https://. 3. Consider running both enrichments and comparing results. If inconsistencies persist, you may want to manually verify the information or request human assistance for further guidance.
Sources: Clay enrichments integration overview | Documentation | Clay University BuiltWith overview | Documentation | Clay University
Panos S.
·
·
https://app.clay.com/workspaces/312220/workbooks/wb_4ZpUaJRZ6Vhu/tables/t_T7hBbpbss9Dn/views/gv_k2XgC5aEtYZG
Bo (.
·
·
Hey Panagiotis We're using a translation function to find the LinkedIn URL associated with each domain, so yes, you can trust the LinkedIn enrichment. In some edge cases, the company you're looking at might be connected to a different domain than what Builtwith shows and in those case, you can also try our Claygent, which is our AI agent that goes online to find more information about companies based on the data you already have.
Panos S.
·
·
thanks Bo (. since i have you here, i have another recurring issue with Icypeas API it doesn't work...had a chat with their CTO and he prompted me here
Panos S.
·
·
can you help?
Panos S.
·
·
also man, what is this weird upselling ladder.... First upgrade to started to use Instantly API I did Now upgrade to Explorer to use Instantly API Any feedback here? Happy to upgrade to explorer but pay the difference
Loading attachments
Panos S.
·
·
i think the issue is email sequencing, while i only want to use Instantly for email validation (that's how i validate emails)
Bo (.
·
·
Hi Panagiotis
I'm checking your account and can see you have access to all 3 Instantly Enrichment.
Could you please clarify what specific issue you're experiencing with the Icypeas API?
Panos S.
·
·
thanks for getting back to me Bo (., i can't use Instantly without upgrading to explorer
Loading attachments
Panos S.
·
·
Regarding Icypeas, it just doesn't work. I get an error. Recording a loom now
Panos S.
·
·
https://www.loom.com/share/85ae09c9fa3e4810a9a85eb01871872a?sid=db86421d-77a5-4888-920c-187f95fe2c55
Bo (.
·
·
I recorded a video for you here: https://cln.sh/LYBsDKlJ Feel free to try to hard refresh: Mac:Chrome and/or Firefox = Press Cmd + Shift + R Safari = Press Cmd + Option + R PC:Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge = Press Ctrl + F5
Panos S.
·
·
oh sh*t Bo (. this is totally my fault 🤦 i've sent you a link to the workspace of a client here's mine - https://app.clay.com/workspaces/397780/workbooks/wb_Sd6konuHEnef/tables/t_daStbxv4MfD5/views/gv_uCSHSnhxGc4d I confirm that everything you showed works for that client (they got the explorer plan + icypeas) Tried hard refresh on mine but didn't help. Can you pls take a look?

22 comments